E4S Programming Systems Guide
Construct your prompt from the instructions below then use the E4S Guide Bot
Introduction
Selecting an appropriate parallel programming system is a key step in developing efficient, portable, and maintainable scientific applications. The E4S ecosystem provides a curated collection of programming models, frameworks, and libraries designed to help developers achieve high performance across diverse architectures including multicore CPUs, manycore GPUs, and emerging accelerators.
When choosing a programming system, it is important to consider factors such as portability, interoperability, runtime overhead, and developer productivity. For instance, a user running on a large GPU-based system might prioritize asynchronous execution and memory management models, while another working with mixed Fortran and C++ codebases might focus on compiler support and interoperability layers.
To help newcomers navigate these choices, the following sections define attributes that describe both general and specialized considerations for selecting a parallel programming system or library. These attributes can be used to formulate a detailed prompt for a chatbot or recommender tool to suggest suitable E4S products.
Example Prompt
I am developing a simulation code in C++ that needs to run efficiently on both NVIDIA and AMD GPUs. I prefer to use a performance-portable library that integrates with MPI for distributed memory and supports OpenMP on CPUs. I would like to minimize the need for vendor-specific code changes and ensure good support for asynchronous execution and profiling tools.
Broadly Meaningful Attributes for Programming Systems
| Attribute | Description |
|---|---|
| Target architectures | The types of architectures supported, such as CPUs, GPUs, or multi-accelerator systems. |
| Programming languages | The primary languages supported (C, C++, Fortran, Python). |
| Portability model | The extent to which the programming system allows running on multiple vendors’ hardware with minimal changes. |
| Performance portability | How effectively the framework can deliver performance across architectures without rewriting kernels. |
| Abstraction level | The level of abstraction provided, from low-level APIs to high-level frameworks. |
| Integration with MPI | Whether the system supports or interoperates with MPI for inter-node communication. |
| Memory model | How data movement and memory management are handled between host and device. |
| Asynchronous execution | Support for task-based or asynchronous parallelism. |
| Debugging and profiling support | Availability of integrated tools or external support for performance analysis. |
| Community and documentation | The strength of community support, user guides, and active development. |
| Licensing and openness | Availability under open-source licenses and alignment with E4S standards. |
Attributes for Specific Situations
Intra-Node Systems
| Attribute | Description |
|---|---|
| Shared memory model | Whether the system supports shared memory parallelism (e.g., OpenMP, CUDA threads). |
| Task scheduling | Support for dynamic task scheduling or work-stealing mechanisms. |
| Thread affinity and control | Ability to control thread placement and binding for NUMA systems. |
| Vectorization support | Level of compiler or library-assisted vectorization. |
| GPU kernel execution model | Control and flexibility in defining and launching GPU kernels. |
| Device memory hierarchy awareness | Capability to utilize L1/L2 caches and shared memory efficiently. |
| Compiler dependencies | Required or preferred compiler infrastructure (LLVM, GCC, NVHPC, etc.). |
Inter-Node Systems
| Attribute | Description |
|---|---|
| Communication model | Message passing or PGAS-based communication model. |
| Latency and bandwidth optimization | Support for minimizing communication overhead and optimizing collective operations. |
| Fault tolerance | Capabilities for checkpoint/restart or resilience in distributed environments. |
| Overlap of communication and computation | Ability to perform asynchronous communications with concurrent computation. |
| Network portability | Compatibility with InfiniBand, Slingshot, Ethernet, and other HPC interconnects. |
| Integration with resource managers | Interoperability with job schedulers such as SLURM or Flux. |
| Hybrid parallelism | Support for combining distributed and shared-memory parallel models (MPI + threads). |
| Performance analysis hooks | Interfaces to collect inter-node communication traces and performance metrics. |
Language-Supported Systems (Modern Fortran and C++ via LLVM Compilers)
| Attribute | Description |
|---|---|
| Standard support level | Compliance with Fortran 2008+, C++17+, or newer standards. |
| Compiler-based directives | Availability of OpenMP, OpenACC, or SYCL support in the compiler. |
| Unified memory model | Simplified access to device and host memory through unified memory. |
| Template and metaprogramming features | Ability to define portable kernels using C++ templates or Fortran coarrays. |
| Integration with performance libraries | Direct compatibility with BLAS, LAPACK, KokkosKernels, or other math libraries. |
| Compiler optimization maturity | Level of maturity and stability of compiler optimizations for each architecture. |
| Language interoperability | Ease of calling C/C++ libraries from Fortran or vice versa. |
| Toolchain integration | Integration with LLVM-based analysis, debugging, and profiling tools. |
| Vendor backend support | Availability of target backends (NVIDIA, AMD, Intel, ARM) through the compiler toolchain. |